Undisclosed Expert Testimony Grounds for New Trial says 4th DCA of Florida

Perryman v. Crawford- The 4th DCA of Florida recently held that surprise, changed or undisclosed expert testimony may result in prejudice sufficient to require a new trial.  In the medical negligence case of  Perryman, the Court concluded that the failure to disclose an expert witness’s opinion in compliance with a pretrial order and a proper discovery request is tantamount to permitting an undisclosed adverse to testify.

Read the entire opinion by clicking here: Perryman v. Crawford

For more information on defending medical malpractice, nursing home and general liability matters in Florida contact Howard Citron at Citron & Associates, P.A. – www.citronlegal.com.

Leave a Reply